BornToMac
Nov 7, 09:43 AM
got the original?
Don't remember where it came from....
http://i668.photobucket.com/albums/vv42/BornToMac_2009/wallpaper-623292.jpg
Don't remember where it came from....
http://i668.photobucket.com/albums/vv42/BornToMac_2009/wallpaper-623292.jpg
SactoGuy18
Apr 20, 10:12 PM
I think Apple's financial results would have been better if they had more iPad 2's to sell.
Unfortunately, we could see a worse-off quarter for Apple the next time because the effects of the parts shortages from Japan may start affecting the bottom line, despite what Apple claims currently.
Unfortunately, we could see a worse-off quarter for Apple the next time because the effects of the parts shortages from Japan may start affecting the bottom line, despite what Apple claims currently.
hcho3
Apr 20, 04:24 PM
Apple needs to cut the prices on ipod nano. 149 dollars for 8GB ipod nano is ridiculous. Everyone is gonna go for ipod touch or iPhone.
With that being said, I am a little bit surprised about ipad sales. But, it will continue to do well. Momentum doesn't stop.
With that being said, I am a little bit surprised about ipad sales. But, it will continue to do well. Momentum doesn't stop.
RMD68
Mar 22, 10:56 PM
Is it supposed to be a hardware fix and a new edition of the PS3 or will it be some sort of firmware fix.
Applejuiced
May 3, 01:39 PM
Try it on another computer maybe.
polishmacuser
Apr 14, 12:57 AM
just ridiculous with AT&T, i bought my unlock and im waiting from CutYourSim, i would rather have an official unlock and not jailbreak. I paid for my phone and i have a right to do with it as I please. Traveling over the years having two phones, one being crappy and one being awesome but no useable sucks.
Jailbreaking is not the proper option or even accessible for certain iPhones at certain firmwares. I say pay the unlock for 169 bucks instead of being called owing 1,000 dollars for roaming charges.
What I'm wondering is that how long will this fiasco go for? Will apple shutdown this or will AT&T?
Jailbreaking is not the proper option or even accessible for certain iPhones at certain firmwares. I say pay the unlock for 169 bucks instead of being called owing 1,000 dollars for roaming charges.
What I'm wondering is that how long will this fiasco go for? Will apple shutdown this or will AT&T?
alph45
Apr 21, 05:42 PM
generally i found the copy to be pretty good. it was punchy and there were some good analogies.
The video got the point across but was unrefined and generally needed to be tightened and focused. For example i would have stopped at the roommate eating the cereal because i get it and everything after becomes redundant. I think you're succeeding from a Communications perspective but the Filmmaking chops need to be developed.
I thought pocket change was the best shot (lower thirds could be a smaller font with a background transparency for readability).
The video got the point across but was unrefined and generally needed to be tightened and focused. For example i would have stopped at the roommate eating the cereal because i get it and everything after becomes redundant. I think you're succeeding from a Communications perspective but the Filmmaking chops need to be developed.
I thought pocket change was the best shot (lower thirds could be a smaller font with a background transparency for readability).
Tiger of PTS
Apr 17, 02:51 PM
It's cute that people think Comex actually ever made a working Jailbreak for iPad 2.
I wish I could photoshop my way to 200k followers on Twitter.
I wish I could photoshop my way to 200k followers on Twitter.
Gomez315
Apr 14, 02:05 PM
Please ban
Clive At Five
Oct 25, 09:36 AM
Imagine where the CD would be today if Philips had never licensed it.
Who still uses CDs? hehe
They're large, clumsy, rigid, and prone to scratching. So are DVDs. And HD-DVDs/Blu-Ray. When are content providers going to get some brains and start licensing on read-only solid state? How many MB is an hour of decently endoded music? 256? We're talking a couple bucks on flash chips here.
Hehe... just a long-time vision of mine... which has yet to be realized. And I couldn't help but make fun of poor old CDs. They're going the way of the Cassette Tape. Who ever thought Mr "Scratch me and I'm useless" CD'son was a good idea. ;) :D
-Clive
Who still uses CDs? hehe
They're large, clumsy, rigid, and prone to scratching. So are DVDs. And HD-DVDs/Blu-Ray. When are content providers going to get some brains and start licensing on read-only solid state? How many MB is an hour of decently endoded music? 256? We're talking a couple bucks on flash chips here.
Hehe... just a long-time vision of mine... which has yet to be realized. And I couldn't help but make fun of poor old CDs. They're going the way of the Cassette Tape. Who ever thought Mr "Scratch me and I'm useless" CD'son was a good idea. ;) :D
-Clive
Lone Deranger
Apr 11, 01:15 PM
Hi everybody,
this is probably a question better asked on a Microsoft forum, but I fear to go to such places. ;)
So here's my dilemma... About year ago I bought a retail version of Windows 7 64-bit Professional and installed it on a Bootcamp partition of my 17" MacBook Pro. Then a month ago, in preparation for a house move/immigration, I decided to sell the machine and thus wiped the HD clean and reformatted and reinstalled OSX but left off the W7 partition, deciding to keep that myself.
However, the sale didn't go through and now the MBP is boxed up and in transit to my destination address. As is my W7 install disc...
So I find myself here, with a new Mac laptop, wanting/needing to install W7 once again (to run my license of Autodesk Softimage). Thankfully I added the W7 serial number to my 'Key chain' so I still have access to it. The question thus becomes; Is there some way to install W7 without having access to my original install disc? Can I download the install software somewhere? And how do I go about activating my license on my new machine?
Thanks for reading! :)
this is probably a question better asked on a Microsoft forum, but I fear to go to such places. ;)
So here's my dilemma... About year ago I bought a retail version of Windows 7 64-bit Professional and installed it on a Bootcamp partition of my 17" MacBook Pro. Then a month ago, in preparation for a house move/immigration, I decided to sell the machine and thus wiped the HD clean and reformatted and reinstalled OSX but left off the W7 partition, deciding to keep that myself.
However, the sale didn't go through and now the MBP is boxed up and in transit to my destination address. As is my W7 install disc...
So I find myself here, with a new Mac laptop, wanting/needing to install W7 once again (to run my license of Autodesk Softimage). Thankfully I added the W7 serial number to my 'Key chain' so I still have access to it. The question thus becomes; Is there some way to install W7 without having access to my original install disc? Can I download the install software somewhere? And how do I go about activating my license on my new machine?
Thanks for reading! :)
benhollberg
Mar 15, 05:16 PM
And by the way... totally get it and KSL it Ben. You can get $100+ and have them come to you. :)
Ya I already sold four for the price I said to you. And plan on doing to same. Even have a couple buyers as long as I get some more iPad 2s.
Ya I already sold four for the price I said to you. And plan on doing to same. Even have a couple buyers as long as I get some more iPad 2s.
Darklandman
Apr 23, 10:19 PM
Thanks! Yes, I have lowered them and get about 15 fps on both games. I guess I can live with that considering the resolution is a step above playing these games through something like Onlive which is kind of janky on wifi and muddy graphics.
What OS are you running?, because I'm pretty sure the MBA can run crysis 2 better than that. Also you could try setting the OS resolution to 800, 450 as theres a guy on youtube getting 25-50 fps with 800,500 on 13inch. Just search crysis 2 MBA.
What OS are you running?, because I'm pretty sure the MBA can run crysis 2 better than that. Also you could try setting the OS resolution to 800, 450 as theres a guy on youtube getting 25-50 fps with 800,500 on 13inch. Just search crysis 2 MBA.
MrFirework
Oct 26, 12:51 PM
Seriously, all you folks who are saying this and that about the bezel control (i.e. Every time I touch it I'll adjust the volume, or change my ringtone... blah, blah...), do you really think Apple would release it's "next big thing" without making sure it worked perfectly, intuitively, and didn't just go completely haywire every time you touch it or bump it?
For crying out loud, the company's future depends in no small part on the iPod, I'm fairly certain Apple's going to make sure each successive iPod is as innovative and market-dominating as the rest of the line has been. THat includes ease-of-use.
Have a little faith, here. You see one patent filing and freak out. Sheesh.
For crying out loud, the company's future depends in no small part on the iPod, I'm fairly certain Apple's going to make sure each successive iPod is as innovative and market-dominating as the rest of the line has been. THat includes ease-of-use.
Have a little faith, here. You see one patent filing and freak out. Sheesh.
Anonymous Freak
Apr 11, 06:35 PM
If you search, you can find a download link that is hosted on Microsoft's own servers. (Or, their digital-distribution partner, Digital River, anyway.)
iChan
Dec 31, 06:34 AM
i think while you are redesigning the site, you may as well redesign the logo, that is getting a bit old now...
however, I guess it is part of your identity... I don't know, no offence, i just never thought much of it. the rest of the site is top notch, esp the content, i will definitely be contributing!
however, I guess it is part of your identity... I don't know, no offence, i just never thought much of it. the rest of the site is top notch, esp the content, i will definitely be contributing!
kwajo.com
Dec 3, 12:11 AM
hmmm, I'm not sure, I've had Apache server running on various machines for over 2 years now and no hacking has taken place, but I'm not sure, obviously you're opening your machine somewhat. I run the OS X firewall and a hardware firewall on my router, probably more peace of mind than actual protection, but it's worked out fine so far
Messy
Nov 14, 10:11 AM
Couple of mine for November.
hulugu
Mar 7, 12:53 AM
Yep, but is it ethical to tax him at 90?
First, 90 was a number I chose just to make a point. Second, I think it's a gradient. Ideally, most of everyone's income should stay with them, people who make very little should be able to eat, have shelter, and the ability to move upwardly should luck and hard work reward them. People who make a great deal should pay, but not because of who they are, but rather because of their finances.
It probably wouldn't, but taxing him through the nose doesn't fit with the idea of rewarding success. Perhaps a better approach would be to incentivise charitable donations and working with charitable organisations.
Success is, I would argue, its own reward. Progressive taxation still rewards those at the top, who only pay higher taxes on their increases. Even when we had very high taxation rates at the very top, we had robber barons creating and destroying companies to enrich themselves. Lowering that rate hasn't created a manifold difference in the amount of overall wealth.
Historically speaking, the post-WWII period in the US featured a huge growth of the middle-class, a growing business and financial industry, major technological jumps, and all with a higher rate of taxation.
This indicates that growth and the middle-class are not inextricably linked to the fortunes of the wealthy. I'd argue that rewarding the wealth while punishing the middle-class is foolish and far more worrisome .
First, 90 was a number I chose just to make a point. Second, I think it's a gradient. Ideally, most of everyone's income should stay with them, people who make very little should be able to eat, have shelter, and the ability to move upwardly should luck and hard work reward them. People who make a great deal should pay, but not because of who they are, but rather because of their finances.
It probably wouldn't, but taxing him through the nose doesn't fit with the idea of rewarding success. Perhaps a better approach would be to incentivise charitable donations and working with charitable organisations.
Success is, I would argue, its own reward. Progressive taxation still rewards those at the top, who only pay higher taxes on their increases. Even when we had very high taxation rates at the very top, we had robber barons creating and destroying companies to enrich themselves. Lowering that rate hasn't created a manifold difference in the amount of overall wealth.
Historically speaking, the post-WWII period in the US featured a huge growth of the middle-class, a growing business and financial industry, major technological jumps, and all with a higher rate of taxation.
This indicates that growth and the middle-class are not inextricably linked to the fortunes of the wealthy. I'd argue that rewarding the wealth while punishing the middle-class is foolish and far more worrisome .
knowbody
Jul 8, 04:50 PM
einsteinium, so you plan on being there at 6am? And I thought I was being smart by being there at 7am. I guess I may have to do the same, just in case.
Thank goodness that Tully's is across the street, because I will be in major need of caffeine that early in the morning.
Thank goodness that Tully's is across the street, because I will be in major need of caffeine that early in the morning.
WildPalms
Oct 25, 09:04 PM
well spoken. If you don't like the terms of the sale, don't complete it. If you buy the music, you've agreed to those terms, like them or not. Sure, I can see that there might be some people who need/want more flexibilty, but perhaps iTunes music downloads just aren't a good match for them. If you see something in a store that you like but you don't think is a good deal, do you buy it anyways? You probably shouldn't if you're not happy with the terms of the sale... Same thing applies to music purchases from Apple.
Now, if Jon hasn't done anything illegal in this, then fine...no problem there. If he has, then Apple has every right to pursue legal action. Like it or not, the license restricts your use of the product, and Apple has well over a billion agreements to that license so far.
Exactly. And at the end of the day, I dont understand all the whining from some people. This is directed at those people who keep whining about Apples DRM...
If you dont want to buy your music from iTunes, then dont, you can buy it elsewhere and still use it on your iPod. But dont you dare presume to start telling a company how they should and shouldnt be running their online store when you have a choice. Its real simple. If you dont like Apple's DRM, DONT BUY YOUR MUSIC FROM ITUNES.
Now, if Jon hasn't done anything illegal in this, then fine...no problem there. If he has, then Apple has every right to pursue legal action. Like it or not, the license restricts your use of the product, and Apple has well over a billion agreements to that license so far.
Exactly. And at the end of the day, I dont understand all the whining from some people. This is directed at those people who keep whining about Apples DRM...
If you dont want to buy your music from iTunes, then dont, you can buy it elsewhere and still use it on your iPod. But dont you dare presume to start telling a company how they should and shouldnt be running their online store when you have a choice. Its real simple. If you dont like Apple's DRM, DONT BUY YOUR MUSIC FROM ITUNES.
kcdude
May 1, 08:35 PM
Kfvljhvljhqrgljqghgliuasryfpiuqsvbmhqer
takao
Apr 16, 05:45 AM
i think it's a little pointless using end of hardware life cycle numbers from the DS and the PSP to now go on making big asumption ... at the end of 2011 the revenue numbers might as well tilt towards the portable makers again with their new hardwares released
daveL
Feb 20, 02:45 PM
If you are running 10.3 or later, the file system is journaled, by default, making the manual use of 'fsck' virtually obsolete. If your filesystem does become corrupt (kernel panic, power failure, etc.), the filesystem journal is used to reconstruct it. If it can't, you probably have a bad disk or a serious low-level bug, neither of which are likely to be repairable by 'fsck'. It certainly doesn't hurt to try running 'fsck' in these circumstance, it's just that you may well be SOL, at that point.
No comments:
Post a Comment