Trakker
Apr 11, 02:03 PM
No, he meant like gallium.
Liquid Metal?
Makes all the little Apple kids fuzz here but it's a load of crap too me.
Carbon Titanium please.
Liquid Metal?
Makes all the little Apple kids fuzz here but it's a load of crap too me.
Carbon Titanium please.
rookiezzz
Apr 17, 09:05 PM
No teacher has ever had a problem, and the same person who confiscated the MBA has seen me using it multiple times without issue.
no problem with the teacher, then WHY??? :mad:
There is no policy that restricts the use of personal laptops, although phones are banned. In fact, most of my teachers reccomend and encourage to use of our laptops because they are much better and have better software.
Call your lawyer lol.. :p
It seems to me that he was just very jealous about the fact he is too low paid to afford a mac and felt the need to try and confiscate it.
you're right :o, some people are jealous with people who can afford that they can't afford..
no problem with the teacher, then WHY??? :mad:
There is no policy that restricts the use of personal laptops, although phones are banned. In fact, most of my teachers reccomend and encourage to use of our laptops because they are much better and have better software.
Call your lawyer lol.. :p
It seems to me that he was just very jealous about the fact he is too low paid to afford a mac and felt the need to try and confiscate it.
you're right :o, some people are jealous with people who can afford that they can't afford..
Mac'nCheese
Apr 12, 10:11 PM
Some reading for citizenzen:
http://travel.state.gov/travel/cis_pa_tw/cis/cis_1012.html
From the us government travel page, advising visitors to Saudi Arabia that the country is under Islamic law and foreigners have been arrested for not dressing properly.
What's your wise-ass answer to that? I hope it includes a smiley!!!
http://travel.state.gov/travel/cis_pa_tw/cis/cis_1012.html
From the us government travel page, advising visitors to Saudi Arabia that the country is under Islamic law and foreigners have been arrested for not dressing properly.
What's your wise-ass answer to that? I hope it includes a smiley!!!
bdkennedy1
Aug 2, 03:51 PM
If anything, multiple desktops would act just like Fast User Switching. I wish Macosxrumors would get their site back online.
Apple's never shown any signs of being keen on Virtual Desktops so I'm not sure where that's coming from, especially as the "Hide/show" feature of NEXTSTEP that ended up in OS X is, arguably, slightly more useful anyway.
If they do have it, I hope it's like the Amiga's screens, with desktops opening and closing automatically rather than being permanently open. They need to be self-managing, and designed to make computing easier to understand. Traditional "multiple desktops" are a powerful feature, but I don't think they aid understandability.
Apple's never shown any signs of being keen on Virtual Desktops so I'm not sure where that's coming from, especially as the "Hide/show" feature of NEXTSTEP that ended up in OS X is, arguably, slightly more useful anyway.
If they do have it, I hope it's like the Amiga's screens, with desktops opening and closing automatically rather than being permanently open. They need to be self-managing, and designed to make computing easier to understand. Traditional "multiple desktops" are a powerful feature, but I don't think they aid understandability.
aiqw9182
Apr 11, 10:36 PM
http://www.cio.com/images/content/articles/body/2011/03/2011_year-of-ipad.jpg
24C
Nov 14, 04:37 PM
Anybody got any display flickering issues. The screen brightness suddenly drops and flicks back up again. Checked the obvious, but the mains power is plugged in and battery fully charged, screen or top case flex doesn't replicate it.
My MacBook is cursed, first it lost the 80GB hard drive... now this :(
My MacBook is cursed, first it lost the 80GB hard drive... now this :(
ZoomZoomZoom
Sep 12, 04:09 PM
I better take care of my ol' shuffle, since when it dies I have to buy a iPod and a USB memory. Not what I call evolution...
Assuming that (1) you use the Shuffle as a music player and use a descent amount of its space, and (2) when using it as a jump drive, you're not storing more than 256MB, you can just get something like a 256MB Cruzer Micro for $15. Which added with the new shuffle, is probably smaller than the old shuffle. Maybe not for everyone, but I like encoding high enough, and have enough songs, that even if I used a shuffle as a jump drive, I wouldn't have much space left after my songs.
I'm not sure where my friend got one of his jump drives, but it is tiny; it's pretty much the end you stick into the USB drive plus a little stub. 128MB. Maybe it's personal preference, but I'd much rather have a tiny player + tiny flash drive than one (relatively) big shuffle.
Assuming that (1) you use the Shuffle as a music player and use a descent amount of its space, and (2) when using it as a jump drive, you're not storing more than 256MB, you can just get something like a 256MB Cruzer Micro for $15. Which added with the new shuffle, is probably smaller than the old shuffle. Maybe not for everyone, but I like encoding high enough, and have enough songs, that even if I used a shuffle as a jump drive, I wouldn't have much space left after my songs.
I'm not sure where my friend got one of his jump drives, but it is tiny; it's pretty much the end you stick into the USB drive plus a little stub. 128MB. Maybe it's personal preference, but I'd much rather have a tiny player + tiny flash drive than one (relatively) big shuffle.
auxplage
Nov 13, 09:33 PM
Yep, that fixed that issue on my MBP, too. I can now close the lid and it goes to sleep. Amazing!
The apple store had ordered me a new top case, motherboard, and sleep sensor to try and fix this. I guess they can send all that back. :)
It is funny how little things bug me. The heat never has bothered me.
But the damn thing not doing to sleep, really made me upset.
The apple store had ordered me a new top case, motherboard, and sleep sensor to try and fix this. I guess they can send all that back. :)
It is funny how little things bug me. The heat never has bothered me.
But the damn thing not doing to sleep, really made me upset.
jppaynesr
Dec 11, 05:43 AM
I will use this app to alert them of no coverage at my home using a wifi connection to my Verizon MiFi (grin). Hope that doesn't create a cellular black hole or something.
Big-TDI-Guy
May 1, 02:01 PM
2: The masses. They don't care about the Big Club because they are too busy watching cheap TV-entertainment while consuming their microwaved dinners - just a modern version of the classical "bread and circus".
I am genuinely sickened and offended by your statement there... As I find it horribly depressing, and ominously true.
I am genuinely sickened and offended by your statement there... As I find it horribly depressing, and ominously true.
Dublinstiof�n
Apr 26, 12:48 PM
Looks beautiful...but Im curious why US Stores didn't receive/start selling them first. :confused:
I mean, this is AMURIKA after all gosh darnit.
We've all been waiting too long for them, not just you! :D
I mean, this is AMURIKA after all gosh darnit.
We've all been waiting too long for them, not just you! :D
Jeffrey903
Aug 7, 08:16 PM
I think that for the first 24 hours that a new event video is up it should be for Mac users only. Maybe even require QuickTime Pro.
Either that or just get better servers and/or use bittorrent.
Either that or just get better servers and/or use bittorrent.
j-traxx
Apr 29, 11:56 PM
Jon Stewart sucks and has always sucked. he royally sucked in the 90's when he tried at a show then, but this segment....... WAS GENIUS! congrats to the writers on a very funny piece!
skunk
Mar 27, 03:13 PM
That's my point really, society has done away with personal responsibility. Prosecution should not even come into this. She made a bad judgement call and if she was to die because of it, she should be sole responsible. She's a victim of her own actions.That is utterly ridiculous.
ericinboston
Mar 29, 10:22 AM
If Nokia has had these patents for 10 years before the iPhone, then why didn't they act when the iPhone was first released?
I would ask the same question. However, that's not how patent law works in the USA. Nokia doesn't have to spend their time/money watching other people's products, tearing them apart, and looking for patent infringement. All Nokia needs to do is SOME DAY realize their patent was infringed and then file a lawsuit. That's it.
But I am sure that Nokia knew a very long time ago that Apple was infringing and did nothing (which is perfectly their right)...and let Apple make billions...then file a lawsuit to cash in. Think about it...why would Nokia file suit immediately to earn, say, a pesky $5 or $20 million (and give Apple a chance to make the product better) when Nokia can wait years and earn hundreds of millions or billions? It's the waiting game that ALL patent holders play.
I feel that the existing law is fine. It's not Nokia's job to watch for patent stealers. There are thousands of "little guys" out there that file patents and truly do not realize till years down the road that their patent was infringed. The law cannot discriminate.
I would ask the same question. However, that's not how patent law works in the USA. Nokia doesn't have to spend their time/money watching other people's products, tearing them apart, and looking for patent infringement. All Nokia needs to do is SOME DAY realize their patent was infringed and then file a lawsuit. That's it.
But I am sure that Nokia knew a very long time ago that Apple was infringing and did nothing (which is perfectly their right)...and let Apple make billions...then file a lawsuit to cash in. Think about it...why would Nokia file suit immediately to earn, say, a pesky $5 or $20 million (and give Apple a chance to make the product better) when Nokia can wait years and earn hundreds of millions or billions? It's the waiting game that ALL patent holders play.
I feel that the existing law is fine. It's not Nokia's job to watch for patent stealers. There are thousands of "little guys" out there that file patents and truly do not realize till years down the road that their patent was infringed. The law cannot discriminate.
technicolor
Sep 12, 11:55 AM
It does say Live Broadcast-Paused
Luph67
Apr 11, 12:17 AM
Aluminum seems to hit the spot when it comes to exterior aesthetics, and that seems to be important to them. Can't see it happening unless they can make carbon fiber look just as good.
lewis82
Mar 1, 07:10 PM
273866
I forgot where I found it, it's been sitting in my Wallpapers folder for a while.
I can upload the original if anyone wants it. :)
EDIT: I just realized the forum software now compresses images... that sucks.
I forgot where I found it, it's been sitting in my Wallpapers folder for a while.
I can upload the original if anyone wants it. :)
EDIT: I just realized the forum software now compresses images... that sucks.
bretm
Dec 2, 09:41 PM
I might repeating the reply because I haven't read the entire thread yet. But you need to install MS Windows Media Player for the Mac.
Jowl
Sep 29, 06:04 PM
Home network worked 'out of the box'
Seems I now have the 'back to my EyeTV' setup correctly too with a bit of port-forwarding on my router. Will test fully tomorrow.
Combined with Sleepover this is awesome. I can wake over LAN/Internet and then use EyeTV App to do as I will. Brilliant:D
Seems I now have the 'back to my EyeTV' setup correctly too with a bit of port-forwarding on my router. Will test fully tomorrow.
Combined with Sleepover this is awesome. I can wake over LAN/Internet and then use EyeTV App to do as I will. Brilliant:D
ChrisA
Jul 12, 04:43 PM
Bad move...
Obviously, there is huge demand for cheaper Macs. Cheap doesn't equal bad!
Mac minis should start at $399
iMacs should start at $899
MacBooks should start at $799
MacBook Pros should start at $1499
Mac Pros should start at $1499
There is no reason this wouldn't work.
Yes. Absolutly. I still hear the argument that Macs are expensive. For example my brother needed a new computer. Even the lowest price Apple computer would cost something like $700. His budget was $250. He was able to buy a generic 2Ghz Celeron mini tower. The $250 system was fast enough for normal email and web browsing. He didn't say that the Mac Mini was "over priced" just that it was "expansive" there is a difference.
Apple simply ignores the low end and this is what most people buy.
They do really need a $399 entry level machine.
Obviously, there is huge demand for cheaper Macs. Cheap doesn't equal bad!
Mac minis should start at $399
iMacs should start at $899
MacBooks should start at $799
MacBook Pros should start at $1499
Mac Pros should start at $1499
There is no reason this wouldn't work.
Yes. Absolutly. I still hear the argument that Macs are expensive. For example my brother needed a new computer. Even the lowest price Apple computer would cost something like $700. His budget was $250. He was able to buy a generic 2Ghz Celeron mini tower. The $250 system was fast enough for normal email and web browsing. He didn't say that the Mac Mini was "over priced" just that it was "expansive" there is a difference.
Apple simply ignores the low end and this is what most people buy.
They do really need a $399 entry level machine.
citizenzen
Apr 13, 08:55 AM
You got owned, citizenzen ...
Do you think so? Let's review ...
It was iJohnHenry who first proposed that that "many Muslim countries force their mores on visitors"
And many Muslim countries force their mores on visitors.
Show me the laws that force a dress code on foreign visitors.
I have a tendency to not accept broad statements like without some kind of source. So I asked for some form of confirmation. I didn't say it wasn't true, just that I needed some evidence. If "many Muslim countries force" visitors to conform, then it shouldn't be hard to find proof to it.
Anything less is just lazy posting.
Seven hours later Mac'nCheese entered in the discussion with ...
You mean when female troops from other countries are "encouraged" to cover up while serving in Muslim countries?
Again, no source, just assertions made without evidence.
Even so I didn't claim he was wrong, I simply pointed out the difference between "encouragement" and "outlawing" ...
Even if your assertion is true, did you notice that the keyword in your post is "encouraged" and not "outlawed".
If France merely "encouraged" Muslim women to forgo the veil and burqa, I think there's very little I would say against such "encouragement".
Obviously frustrated by the failure of his first point, Mac'nCheese finally did a little research and came up with the evidence to iJohnHenry's assertion made nearly nine hours earlier ...
Some reading for citizenzen:
http://travel.state.gov/travel/cis_pa_tw/cis/cis_1012.html
From the us government travel page, advising visitors to Saudi Arabia that the country is under Islamic law and foreigners have been arrested for not dressing properly.
What's your wise-ass answer to that? I hope it includes a smiley!!!
So bravo! Somebody finally came up with evidence! Evidence that I never denied existed, I just requested that it actually be presented.
Sorry to be so demanding of facts. I do realize how little they mean to some of you. And nice editing of the record to paint a conversation in a way that would make Andrew Breitbart proud. If you ever give up your current job, you should consider giving him a call. :rolleyes:
Do you think so? Let's review ...
It was iJohnHenry who first proposed that that "many Muslim countries force their mores on visitors"
And many Muslim countries force their mores on visitors.
Show me the laws that force a dress code on foreign visitors.
I have a tendency to not accept broad statements like without some kind of source. So I asked for some form of confirmation. I didn't say it wasn't true, just that I needed some evidence. If "many Muslim countries force" visitors to conform, then it shouldn't be hard to find proof to it.
Anything less is just lazy posting.
Seven hours later Mac'nCheese entered in the discussion with ...
You mean when female troops from other countries are "encouraged" to cover up while serving in Muslim countries?
Again, no source, just assertions made without evidence.
Even so I didn't claim he was wrong, I simply pointed out the difference between "encouragement" and "outlawing" ...
Even if your assertion is true, did you notice that the keyword in your post is "encouraged" and not "outlawed".
If France merely "encouraged" Muslim women to forgo the veil and burqa, I think there's very little I would say against such "encouragement".
Obviously frustrated by the failure of his first point, Mac'nCheese finally did a little research and came up with the evidence to iJohnHenry's assertion made nearly nine hours earlier ...
Some reading for citizenzen:
http://travel.state.gov/travel/cis_pa_tw/cis/cis_1012.html
From the us government travel page, advising visitors to Saudi Arabia that the country is under Islamic law and foreigners have been arrested for not dressing properly.
What's your wise-ass answer to that? I hope it includes a smiley!!!
So bravo! Somebody finally came up with evidence! Evidence that I never denied existed, I just requested that it actually be presented.
Sorry to be so demanding of facts. I do realize how little they mean to some of you. And nice editing of the record to paint a conversation in a way that would make Andrew Breitbart proud. If you ever give up your current job, you should consider giving him a call. :rolleyes:
Ithiel
Jan 10, 04:34 AM
Here's mine!
http://img443.imageshack.us/img443/595/0018tbfd.jpg
http://img443.imageshack.us/img443/595/0018tbfd.jpg
papadopolis1024
Apr 24, 04:22 PM
Ya I think by the time that it comes out they might as well call it iLife 08.
No comments:
Post a Comment