usclaneyj
Dec 1, 05:41 PM
Yojiirill is right. Some libraries actually have pretty decent music collections.
Here in Columbia, SC our library rents out CDs, DVDs, and even video games.
..and books too!
Here in Columbia, SC our library rents out CDs, DVDs, and even video games.
..and books too!
Jaffa Cake
Dec 22, 07:41 AM
The longer you keep hold of it, the less people will have a Mac that will require the older card (as they upgrade, they'll be wanting an Airport extreme card, or whatever comes along next to replace it).
Your best bet is probably just to pop it in the post to me � it'll go nicely with my G3 iBook. I won't charge you anything for taking it off your hands, seeing as how it's Christmas. :p
Your best bet is probably just to pop it in the post to me � it'll go nicely with my G3 iBook. I won't charge you anything for taking it off your hands, seeing as how it's Christmas. :p
Chundles
Oct 24, 06:04 PM
There's a blast from the past: "Simple Finder" is back! :eek:
Simple Finder is in Tiger as well:
http://img152.imageshack.us/img152/4631/picture1th7.png
Simple Finder is in Tiger as well:
http://img152.imageshack.us/img152/4631/picture1th7.png
GGJstudios
Apr 29, 03:27 PM
it's windows format only because I need to use my hd's on a pc sometimes.
NTFS (Windows NT File System)
Johnny Depp Actor Johnny Depp
Johnny Depp - Pirates Of The
Pirates Of The Caribbean The
Pirates of the Carribean
johnny depp pirates Johnny
Pirates of the Caribbean
Trouble in Pirates Of The
HUNK Johnny Depp will net $32
Depp returns as the pirate
johnny depp pirates of the
WHERE does the Pirates of the
the conclusion of Pirates
Pirates of the Caribbean
Johnny Depp - Pirates Of The
NTFS (Windows NT File System)
JavaTheHut
May 3, 12:04 PM
Using PS in x64 mode can use a lot a RAM, a medium to large file 500MB~1GB can make use of excess of 20GB RAM. then throw in other active apps... I have seen these numbers using the Activity Monitor. I am using 4*8GB OWC sticks
What 3d program are you using?
Read this article from http://macperformanceguide.com (http://macperformanceguide.com/Mac-Upgrade-CaseStudy-MacPro-Memory.html)
What 3d program are you using?
Read this article from http://macperformanceguide.com (http://macperformanceguide.com/Mac-Upgrade-CaseStudy-MacPro-Memory.html)
Fiveos22
Mar 1, 11:01 PM
What does this mean? The slashdot crowd hasn't even weighed in on this yet (11:00 PM central).
Does this mean that Gimp is going to get a major overhaul?
Will I be able to get a less expensive version of CS?
Will I be able to compile my own CS (holy crap!)?
Does this mean that Gimp is going to get a major overhaul?
Will I be able to get a less expensive version of CS?
Will I be able to compile my own CS (holy crap!)?
katchow
Sep 23, 10:51 AM
does it have a vanity mirror?
Nermal
Mar 9, 05:29 PM
Check that you're using your ISP's DNS servers. I've seen similar problems where users have changed to a different ISP's DNS for troubleshooting reasons and forgotten to change them back, causing geolocation to return a non-optimal server.
Mystikal
Mar 19, 05:55 PM
I assume you're providing a link to a similar thread. However, I'm unable to access it.
Its the Marketplace forum. Thats odd, the link works for me.
Its the Marketplace forum. Thats odd, the link works for me.
Action Jackson
May 6, 06:01 PM
I have 4 SSD's.
A 256 GB OWC, in a 2007 BMB.A 64GB OWC in a 2008 BMB, both are mission critical, and I run my business with them.
I also have 2- 1.6 GHZ 4/64 11" refurb MBA's, that I am in the process of installing 360GB OWC Aura's in each.(one more to buy)
All OWC SSD's have performed as advertised, and have been problem free.
I have spoken with Hellhammer, and he has advised against the hack to enable TRIM on each, I
believe Apple supports garbage collection, on their own drives,but not others, but Lion will
support Trim, so I am waiting for Lion before I activate the MBA's
I have been very happy with all RAM, and SSD's purchased from OWC.:cool:
I was under the impression that garbage collection functions within the SSD itself, independently from the OS... whereas TRIM relies on OS support. Am I wrong about that?
Also really interested to hear how speed/performance of the current stock MBP SSD's compare to the 3rd-party alternatives out there.
A 256 GB OWC, in a 2007 BMB.A 64GB OWC in a 2008 BMB, both are mission critical, and I run my business with them.
I also have 2- 1.6 GHZ 4/64 11" refurb MBA's, that I am in the process of installing 360GB OWC Aura's in each.(one more to buy)
All OWC SSD's have performed as advertised, and have been problem free.
I have spoken with Hellhammer, and he has advised against the hack to enable TRIM on each, I
believe Apple supports garbage collection, on their own drives,but not others, but Lion will
support Trim, so I am waiting for Lion before I activate the MBA's
I have been very happy with all RAM, and SSD's purchased from OWC.:cool:
I was under the impression that garbage collection functions within the SSD itself, independently from the OS... whereas TRIM relies on OS support. Am I wrong about that?
Also really interested to hear how speed/performance of the current stock MBP SSD's compare to the 3rd-party alternatives out there.
zap2
Dec 25, 09:37 AM
This happened to me on my iMac just restart(worked for me)
GadgetAddict
Aug 25, 10:34 AM
Nice workaround! Too bad my stations don't offer m3u...
MacRumors
Aug 7, 06:00 PM
http://www.macrumors.com/images/macrumorsthreadlogo.gif (http://www.macrumors.com)
Microsoft has announced that it has halted development on a universal version of VirtualPC.
In a statement on Monday, Microsoft said it "has made the decision not to move forward with a Universal version of Virtual PC at this time." -- via News.com (http://news.com.com/2100-1012_3-6102930.html?part=rss&tag=6102930&subj=news)
VirtualPC has long-been the king of the hill for Virtualization on Macintosh. With the Intel transition, however, came competitive pressure from Parallels (http://www.parallels.com/en/products/desktop/), which has since released the final version of its product, and VMWare which is showcasing a beta (http://www.macrumors.com/pages/2006/08/20060805151513.shtml) of its solution at WWDC.
Microsoft has claimed that to port VirtualPC to Intel would be much like making VirtualPC 1.0 all over again.
Because of how closely virtualization software is tied to an operating system, Microsoft said that moving Virtual PC to the Intel-based Mac would be "similar to creating a version 1.0 release."
Digg This (http://digg.com/apple/Microsoft_Officially_Kills_Virtual_PC)
Microsoft has announced that it has halted development on a universal version of VirtualPC.
In a statement on Monday, Microsoft said it "has made the decision not to move forward with a Universal version of Virtual PC at this time." -- via News.com (http://news.com.com/2100-1012_3-6102930.html?part=rss&tag=6102930&subj=news)
VirtualPC has long-been the king of the hill for Virtualization on Macintosh. With the Intel transition, however, came competitive pressure from Parallels (http://www.parallels.com/en/products/desktop/), which has since released the final version of its product, and VMWare which is showcasing a beta (http://www.macrumors.com/pages/2006/08/20060805151513.shtml) of its solution at WWDC.
Microsoft has claimed that to port VirtualPC to Intel would be much like making VirtualPC 1.0 all over again.
Because of how closely virtualization software is tied to an operating system, Microsoft said that moving Virtual PC to the Intel-based Mac would be "similar to creating a version 1.0 release."
Digg This (http://digg.com/apple/Microsoft_Officially_Kills_Virtual_PC)
snberk103
Mar 12, 01:57 PM
I blush, and thanks.
Just make sure that you let us know what it is you do end up with!
A Mini is also not a bad idea.
1) Get a refurbished one to save some bucks. Max out the RAM yourself - save bucks over Apple doing it.
2) Add FW external HDDs for storage. They can be used on a Mac Pro or an iMac later on.
3) With the money saved on the Mini, you can get a high quality monitor. Also transferable to a Mac Pro or an iMac later (as a 2nd monitor). A good monitor can used for several to many years comfortably. Imho, it's better to produce better photos (because the monitor is accurate) and wait some extra seconds, than to get a faster computer but put out photos with inaccurate colour.
4) Start investing in the SW tools that you will want/need. These are also transferable to a new system.
5) When you finally spring for a fully loaded, 24 core, 512MB RAM, 72 TB Storage, 4 graphic cards, 4 Thunderbolt ports iMac Pro Supreme Tower all of the peripherals and software moves too.
It's how I got started. A small Mini with a 23" ACD. Everything I bought to go with it also had to work with a (future) Mac Pro. Eventually I was working with Photoshop files that were approaching 1GB, on a Mini with only 1GB of memory (the days when opening a Mini involved spludging).
There was a lot of HDD thrashing. I was afraid that PS would crash, so I saved often. It took so long to save a big file, that I could go out and mow the lawn or do the dishes while it thrashed away. I got a lot of housework done that summer. Ironically, that Mini never crashed. Not once.
Eventually I got my current Mac Pro, and it was like moving from steam trains to warp drive. All the peripherals and SW moved too, so the only cost was the Mac Pro itself plus the extra HDDs I added at the time.
That Mini then got hooked up the TV where it served up all of our music throughout the house, and movies to the TV for a couple of years. I've upgraded that Mini to a newer one but the first one still works, and I keep it as a spare.
Nah... I just feel sentimental for it. What a workhorse!
Just make sure that you let us know what it is you do end up with!
A Mini is also not a bad idea.
1) Get a refurbished one to save some bucks. Max out the RAM yourself - save bucks over Apple doing it.
2) Add FW external HDDs for storage. They can be used on a Mac Pro or an iMac later on.
3) With the money saved on the Mini, you can get a high quality monitor. Also transferable to a Mac Pro or an iMac later (as a 2nd monitor). A good monitor can used for several to many years comfortably. Imho, it's better to produce better photos (because the monitor is accurate) and wait some extra seconds, than to get a faster computer but put out photos with inaccurate colour.
4) Start investing in the SW tools that you will want/need. These are also transferable to a new system.
5) When you finally spring for a fully loaded, 24 core, 512MB RAM, 72 TB Storage, 4 graphic cards, 4 Thunderbolt ports iMac Pro Supreme Tower all of the peripherals and software moves too.
It's how I got started. A small Mini with a 23" ACD. Everything I bought to go with it also had to work with a (future) Mac Pro. Eventually I was working with Photoshop files that were approaching 1GB, on a Mini with only 1GB of memory (the days when opening a Mini involved spludging).
There was a lot of HDD thrashing. I was afraid that PS would crash, so I saved often. It took so long to save a big file, that I could go out and mow the lawn or do the dishes while it thrashed away. I got a lot of housework done that summer. Ironically, that Mini never crashed. Not once.
Eventually I got my current Mac Pro, and it was like moving from steam trains to warp drive. All the peripherals and SW moved too, so the only cost was the Mac Pro itself plus the extra HDDs I added at the time.
That Mini then got hooked up the TV where it served up all of our music throughout the house, and movies to the TV for a couple of years. I've upgraded that Mini to a newer one but the first one still works, and I keep it as a spare.
Nah... I just feel sentimental for it. What a workhorse!
Pigumon
Oct 31, 05:45 PM
The main reason I hate this idea is, I have a 3G iPod, which is easily apple's most poorly designed ipod.
You can FEEL for the buttons to skip or pause or whatever. Once you touch, you've already skipped to the next song. Having to contantly put on the lock button is very annoying.
To imagine just holding this and accidently activating a million options...
I can hope this is either a decoy, or that somehow apple has figured out something we arent seeing from the diagrams.
If it's anything like the 3G model.. NO! NO! NO!!! Bad Apple!
BTW What happened to the super hip anime style "none-touch" ipod?
You can FEEL for the buttons to skip or pause or whatever. Once you touch, you've already skipped to the next song. Having to contantly put on the lock button is very annoying.
To imagine just holding this and accidently activating a million options...
I can hope this is either a decoy, or that somehow apple has figured out something we arent seeing from the diagrams.
If it's anything like the 3G model.. NO! NO! NO!!! Bad Apple!
BTW What happened to the super hip anime style "none-touch" ipod?
SevenInchScrew
Mar 26, 10:52 AM
well what do you think?
The game is great looking visually, but I personally don't care for flight games. The last game based around planes that I enjoyed was U.N. Squadron on the SNES. That game was awesome.
The game is great looking visually, but I personally don't care for flight games. The last game based around planes that I enjoyed was U.N. Squadron on the SNES. That game was awesome.
Schizoid
Apr 21, 05:41 AM
Apple sold nearly 5 million iPads last quarter... now this sounds good to me, why are the media reporting this as "disappointing." Am I missing something here? Surely this should be at least "pretty good."
Avicenna
May 4, 11:39 PM
I have an NSView subclass which registers for drag files in init method like this:
In Pirates of the Caribbean 4,
kuwisdelu
May 6, 10:44 PM
Above are two good options. My question is why you want to do it. Depending on that, it may be unnecessary or there may be a better way of doing what you want.
OldSchoolMacGuy
May 2, 03:37 PM
You can use the Migration Assistant and select the Time Machine drive, then select the file types you'd like to move over if you're looking to move things like apps, documents, preferences, etc rather than just specific files. For specific files, there are a couple nice Time Machine browser applications out there that can make going through the backup files easier.
andiwm2003
Apr 18, 09:55 AM
my 3GS is having more and more issues. battery life goes down, touchscreen is getting less responsive/less precise. I hope it holds up for a while.
If not I can get either:
- the rumored white iPhone 4 end of April
- the rumored iPhone 5 end of September
- the rumored iPhone 6 in 2012
nice, every few month a rumored replacement for my 3GS:rolleyes:
If not I can get either:
- the rumored white iPhone 4 end of April
- the rumored iPhone 5 end of September
- the rumored iPhone 6 in 2012
nice, every few month a rumored replacement for my 3GS:rolleyes:
Cinematographer
Apr 20, 03:53 PM
Three years ago: iPhone revenue = 10 % of Apple's revenue
Two years ago: iPhone revenue = 26% of Apple's revenue
Now: iPhone revenue = half of Apple's revenue :eek:
Two years ago: iPhone revenue = 26% of Apple's revenue
Now: iPhone revenue = half of Apple's revenue :eek:
karsten
Apr 10, 02:21 PM
Hi, i've tried everything i can think of. i'm trying to make a separate subnet for my local network. it's only 2 computers, a desktop and a laptop. i have it assigned to the ethernet ports as 192.168.2.1 & 192.168.2.2 (desktop/laptop). my desktop has a wifi connection as 192.168.1.100. i want to be able to connect them with ethernet for transferring lots of files and have os x automatically use that connection instead of the wireless as it's slow. i've tried setting the network priorities in network preferences, and adding a route in the routing table but it keeps trying to use the wireless between the 2 computers. how can i do this? thanks for any help (ps i want the internet to stay active when i connect the ethernet)
edit- i can kind of make it work by disabling the wireless on the laptop.
edit- i can kind of make it work by disabling the wireless on the laptop.
player9
Sep 14, 12:03 AM
I did some more research on this and it appears that we will have to wait probably for the Linux programmers to port Foomatic to OSX. That is if Epson does not release a driver eventually.
I tried to follow the directions on this site, but this assumes that you are running Linux and that Foomatic is already installed, along with Ghostscript and CUPS. I was able to apply the PPD file for the EPL-5700 to my printer and see it in Print Center but the in between framework is missing: the cupsomatic script and Foomatic system. I can print but the printer does not respond, so CUPS is not sending the data to the printer.
I couldn't figure out where to put the cupsomatic script since OSX does not have the directory substructure of redhat.
http://www.linuxprinting.org/foomatic.html
http://www.linuxprinting.org/cups-doc.html
I also found this site helpful:
http://www.danka.de/apple-cups-en/
I tried to follow the directions on this site, but this assumes that you are running Linux and that Foomatic is already installed, along with Ghostscript and CUPS. I was able to apply the PPD file for the EPL-5700 to my printer and see it in Print Center but the in between framework is missing: the cupsomatic script and Foomatic system. I can print but the printer does not respond, so CUPS is not sending the data to the printer.
I couldn't figure out where to put the cupsomatic script since OSX does not have the directory substructure of redhat.
http://www.linuxprinting.org/foomatic.html
http://www.linuxprinting.org/cups-doc.html
I also found this site helpful:
http://www.danka.de/apple-cups-en/
No comments:
Post a Comment